Post by Peter TrögerParticipants: Daniel G., Roger, Mariusz, Peter
- Peter plans to perform "last call" and document submission during June
(http://bit.ly/iqnFv2)
- Would lead to running public comment period during OGF32
- Daniel, Mariusz, and Roger will not be there, Peter tries to
Post by Peter Tröger2. Discussion of open points from Nadav Brandes (see last mails)
- Limit amount of bulk jobs active at the same time
? ? ? ?- Supported in Grid Engine, Torque, and LSF
? ? ? ?- not feasible as optional job template parameter, since it would not
make any sense for non-bulk jobs
? ? ? ?- Agreement to apply proposed extension of runBulkJobs() signature
? ? ? ?- Acts as MAY hint for the DRM system, no promise for consideration
- Add rerun() method for single jobs
? ? ? ?- FAILED must keep it's current terminal semantic
? ? ? ?- same functionality can be achieved be submitting failed jobs again
with the original job template, which is available from the job
Post by Peter Tröger3. Solving remaining issues in DRMAAv2 Draft 3
- Recent discussion about hard limits on the list
? ? ? ?- Agreement that most systems ultimatively map to OS setrlimit()
? ? ? ?- Decision to describe hard limit violation effect per ResourceLimitTpe
entry
? ? ? ?- Decision to only specify if jobs fails or does not fail
? ? ? ?- All further effects (e.g. no more open() calls possible) are out of
scope for DRMAA, since they relate to operating system behavior on
execution host
- Proposal my Mariusz to have machine state indication
? ? ? ?- Machine struct used to represent installed hosts
? ? ? ?- Might be not available for job execution at the time of querying
? ? ? ?- Decision to have boolean flag expressing usability of machine for job
execution (== as part of a candidateHosts list)
? ? ? ?- Denote timeing issues - machine state might changing between querying
and actual job submission
? ? ? ?- No implication on job submission success if unavailable hosts are
used in the specfication -> job might stay QUEUED until the machine
becomes available again
- Proposal by Mariusz to bundle DRMAA implementation capability check
? ? ? ?- Meanwhile different optional functions (event notification, advanced
reservation)
? ? ? ?- Agreement to have session function which takes an entry from a
capability enumeration as input, and returns a Boolean of this feature
is supported
Post by Peter TrögerDraft version 4 may arrive in time before the call.
It did not. Mariusz is working on advance reservation part during the
weekend.
attached (i do not have commit rights to the DRMAA svn project). I
https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AqyvnBscJNqxcnJBSUs5dXRrU29EUVhGOGthc1lDTFE&hl=en#gid=12
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/drmaa-wg/attachments/20110509/c6430f3a/attachment-0001.tex
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/drmaa-wg/attachments/20110509/c6430f3a/attachment-0001.obj
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/drmaa-wg/attachments/20110509/c6430f3a/attachment-0001.pdf